Nekio
{Gilfinder}
So, if if others with less than 50 points are also as dedicated, and it's just a means of throwing away points, you'd have no problem with everyone with 16 points and up spending 50 points to lot on an item at the upper tier, even if it puts them in the negatives?
The only purpose putting in a 50-point tier would serve is to give the current top point leaders the ability to win an AF of their choice uncontested. I don't know why we're skipping around the real issue...
If this whole debate is really just to reward dedication, then I'd be happy to spend 50 points to lot THF armlets in an upper bracket the next time they drop, even if it means I will be in the red and have to attend 3 months of Dynamis without winning anything to lot anything else.
The only purpose putting in a 50-point tier would serve is to give the current top point leaders the ability to win an AF of their choice uncontested. I don't know why we're skipping around the real issue...
If this whole debate is really just to reward dedication, then I'd be happy to spend 50 points to lot THF armlets in an upper bracket the next time they drop, even if it means I will be in the red and have to attend 3 months of Dynamis without winning anything to lot anything else.
Last edited: