Rule Change - New Point Tier

I meant by what I was posting, is that it does matter to some people the clarification of the calling out of "Lv. 1+ 0pt" when its said. That way say someone @lv.X that plans on leveling the job is able to lot, and not be confused.
 
I don't really want to add to any confusion to rules/points/lotting, but since 0pts lvl 1+ is so close to free lot would there be any talks or discussions about letting people that have currency in comment cast lots if they wanted but forfeit the potential future lotting of currency for that run? In my mind no one is really going into a dynamis thinking they'll comment AF for just their lvl 20 DRK if that is all they want or can get aside from currency from the zone. I only used DRK as an example so don't play the DRK, DRG, BST, ect. always goes free lot card.

Rules are rules whatever you decide, but I doubt 99% of the people that go to dynamis think that AF goes past 60+ no points. You always get people shocked on their 1st run with this.
 
I actually completely forgot about that. I'm leaning towards yes, but if the person had already won currency then they couldn't lot obviously.
 
This would clear up the issue we had in Bastok a week or so ago when everyone wanted people to pass DRG for Emrium, who would have probably taken advantage of this rule if it had been in effect. It could happen again, and it wasn't particularly pretty the way we had it set up (people "mildly" suggesting to people winning the lot that they should pass to be nice). Less drama during a run = gewd
 
If people pass do it on your own conscious i agree with the encouraging others to do it for long standing members being wrong. Especially a Bastok drop. come on its Bastok. Just as i would be mad at people telling others to pass on my thief's gloves if they ever drop.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top