In response to this notice:
As a quick measure, maybe add [default rank] next to the spiky ball rank so it's more self explanatory as to the fact that it is the default rank of someone that joins? Surely just adding a bit of text beside the rank name wouldn't be too complex?
Example:
Finally time to get a proper hierarchy system?
This has come up time and again, but we still don't have a proper hierarchy system despite the above sitting there creating expectations of anyone that doesn't specifically search for how the ranks work. Even beyond the word "hierarchy" being used, the expectation of it's functionality is bolstered by the ability to move the ranks up and down the list. We don't need ranks to be able to promote/demote above their (currently only perceived) rank and at best there should be an option to promote to/demote from the same rank level.
Continue reading...
As a quick measure, maybe add [default rank] next to the spiky ball rank so it's more self explanatory as to the fact that it is the default rank of someone that joins? Surely just adding a bit of text beside the rank name wouldn't be too complex?
Example:
Finally time to get a proper hierarchy system?
This has come up time and again, but we still don't have a proper hierarchy system despite the above sitting there creating expectations of anyone that doesn't specifically search for how the ranks work. Even beyond the word "hierarchy" being used, the expectation of it's functionality is bolstered by the ability to move the ranks up and down the list. We don't need ranks to be able to promote/demote above their (currently only perceived) rank and at best there should be an option to promote to/demote from the same rank level.
Continue reading...