Who should lot first tier?

Who should be allowed to lot first tier? Choose one.

  • Everyone.

    Votes: 2 9.5%
  • Members with 50%

    Votes: 8 38.1%
  • Members with 60%

    Votes: 4 19.0%
  • Members with 70%

    Votes: 5 23.8%
  • Members with 75%

    Votes: 1 4.8%
  • Members with 100%

    Votes: 1 4.8%

  • Total voters
    21
  • Poll closed .

yelsaewnor

Ron Weasley
FC/Active Member
This vote is for the percent which should be required to lot first tier.

The current attendance required is 50% of points in the last 8 runs.

This is a method of seeing where everyone stands on this issue. If there is strong support for a change it MAY be put in to place.
 
Last edited:
Okay, just wanted to say first off, I need no AF until I actually get another job leveled, or an AF upgraded.

With that, I'd say 100% is too much to ask for. Real life has hit me a couple times and I'm sure it's hit many of you as well. One Weds you're running a fever of 102 and so you don't show for Dynamis - 8 weeks you can't lot top tier. There should be a little leeway. I'd be fine with anything between the 50% up to 75%. I can't vote that way though ; ; so I'm just saying it here.
 
One Weds you're running a fever of 102 and so you don't show for Dynamis - 8 weeks you can't lot top tier.

Just a little correction here. Would be 8 runs or 4 weeks if you missed one run. Not 8 weeks :tounge-3:.
 
Just a little correction here. Would be 8 runs or 4 weeks if you missed one run. Not 8 weeks :tounge-3:.

/sigh

my math no good.
 
I'm pretty content with the balance our current lotting rules provide between encouraging attendance and keeping the sometimes attendees out of the first tier.
 
Back
Top