With the graphics update, I've seen alot of posts about face differences before and after. Alot of the differences I think are up to personal scrutiny on whether or not they are noticeable.
I've noticed this particular face difference that is glaringly different, however.
Were these ever explained by the developers?
I remember there was a mentioning that they wanted to keep faces close to how they originally appeared before the graphics update, but this change seems way too glaring to be a mistake.
The face markings have turned from a monochromatic gray to a strange, and personally off-putting, mix of bruise-purple of different shades.
Was there ever any word about this change in any live letter or such? Is it to conform to some lore behind miqote, or return to 1.0 graphics or something?
Has anyone noticed any other seemingly "intentional" changes to other races or faces with the graphics update?
Before:
After:
Screenshots were snipped from another forum post.
Continue reading...
I've noticed this particular face difference that is glaringly different, however.
Were these ever explained by the developers?
I remember there was a mentioning that they wanted to keep faces close to how they originally appeared before the graphics update, but this change seems way too glaring to be a mistake.
The face markings have turned from a monochromatic gray to a strange, and personally off-putting, mix of bruise-purple of different shades.
Was there ever any word about this change in any live letter or such? Is it to conform to some lore behind miqote, or return to 1.0 graphics or something?
Has anyone noticed any other seemingly "intentional" changes to other races or faces with the graphics update?
Before:
After:
Screenshots were snipped from another forum post.
Continue reading...